I am convinced now more than anything of Hentai-Foundry's sexual bias issues. Most of there denials are completely irrational and not founded on much besides being afraid of anything that might gather traction. I have seven images uploaded there that have a few mistakes, I am not so prideful that I can't admit it, and that is why I upload more images and I continue to practice and make tweaks and change this or that, etc. The point is I don't believe in bad art or that anything is worth trashing, I am a Bob Ross disciple and I only believe in happy mistakes, that can be corrected in time. So when a company suggests that a piece of art is irredeemable, I become a little upset.
Date: March 6, 2019
Rejection notice: Sorry, but this picture will not be approved for submission. It would require a significant amount of reworking in order to meet the quality requirements. Please do not attempt to resubmit this image for approval.
You want to know which picture set them off: https://www.newgrounds.com/art/view/adventvoice/black-amethyst-2
They were not going to have it, but they were willing to take: https://www.newgrounds.com/art/view/adventvoice/clara
See what I mean, irrational, now I never complained when they decided Clara was suitable, I mean I love all of my creations. They all have a special place in my heart. It took them 4 days to mull over Black Amethyst and I guess I should enjoy the fact that they looked at for so long.
It took them less than a day to tell me: Date: March 11, 2019
Rejection notice: Sorry, but this picture has anatomy errors and does not meet our quality standards for submission. For further and more detailed help and advice, please use our Constructive Critique forum.
Can you imagine https://www.newgrounds.com/art/view/adventvoice/dreams-of-being-alone does not meet there quality standards but https://www.newgrounds.com/art/view/adventvoice/sarah-and-the-narcissist-sex-education which is riddled with mistakes that I only noticed days after submitting it.
It is days like this that I am tempted to get on my high horse and denounce them for their hypocrisy and feature my own works to prove the point. You can not deny me publication on the basis of my work not meeting your standards of approval when it is clearly better in presentation than anything I have presented before. If I was to listen to that group I would continue in the same mistakes and publish works of the same caliber from The Adventures of Pete & Pete began on Nickelodeon in 1989, oh the glory days and yeah I am not going back that far to appease some moderators on a smut site. All because they don't like the Dream Weaver's appeal with beautiful whores.